DEFENDING JESUS CHRIST
Posted on by Mark
Peter’s Denial by Michael D. O’Brien
Years ago at the height of his preaching ministry and before a tragic relapse, Fr. John Corapi came to a conference I was attending. In his deep throaty voice, he took to the stage, looked out upon the intent crowd with a grimace and exclaimed: “I’m angry. I’m angry at you. I’m angry at me.” He then went on to explain in his usual boldness that his righteous anger was due to a Church sitting on its hands in the face of a world in need of the Gospel.
With that, I am republishing this article from October 31st, 2019. I have updated it with a section called “Globalism Spark”.
A BLAZING FIRE has been stoked in my soul on two particular occasions this year. It is a fire of justice springing from a desire to defend Jesus Christ of Nazareth.
The first time was on my journey to Israel and the Holy Land. I spent several days contemplating the incredible humility of God to have come to this remote place on earth and walk among us, clothed in our humanity. From Christ’s birth to His Passion, I followed along His trail of miracles, teachings and tears. One day in Bethlehem, we celebrated Mass. During the homily, I heard the priest say, “We don’t need to convert the Muslims, Jews, or others. Convert yourself and let God convert them.” I sat there stunned, trying to process what I’d just heard. Then the words of St. Paul flooded my mind:
But how can they call on him in whom they have not believed? And how can they believe in him of whom they have not heard? And how can they hear without someone to preach? And how can people preach unless they are sent? As it is written, “How beautiful are the feet of those who bring [the] good news!” (Rom 10:14-15)
Since then, a “mother bear” like instinct has arisen in my soul. Jesus Christ did not suffer and die and send the Holy Spirit upon His Church so that we could hold hands with unbelievers and feel good about ourselves. It is our duty and truly our privilege to share the Gospel with the nations who are waiting, searching and even longing to hear the Good News:
The Church respects and esteems these non Christian religions because they are the living expression of the soul of vast groups of people. They carry within them the echo of thousands of years of searching for God, a quest which is incomplete but often made with great sincerity and righteousness of heart. They possess an impressive patrimony of deeply religious texts. They have taught generations of people how to pray. They are all impregnated with innumerable “seeds of the Word” and can constitute a true “preparation for the Gospel,”… [But] neither respect and esteem for these religions nor the complexity of the questions raised is an invitation to the Church to withhold from these non-Christians the proclamation of Jesus Christ. On the contrary the Church holds that these multitudes have the right to know the riches of the mystery of Christ—riches in which we believe that the whole of humanity can find, in unsuspected fullness, everything that it is gropingly searching for concerning God, man and his destiny, life and death, and truth. —POPE ST. PAUL VI, Evangelii Nuntiandi, n. 53; vatican.va
I consider that day in Bethlehem a great grace, because the fire to defend Jesus has been burning ever since…
The second time this fire billowed in my soul was when I watched the tree-planting ceremony in the Vatican Gardens and the accompanying rituals and prostrations before indigenous wooden carvings. I waited several days before commenting; I wanted to know what these people were doing and to whom they were bowing. Then answers started coming. While one woman is heard on video calling one of the figures “Our Lady of the Amazon,” which Pope Francis blessed, three Vatican spokesmen vigorously rejected the idea that the carvings represented Our Lady.
“It is not the Virgin Mary, who said it is the Virgin Mary? …It is an indigenous woman who represents life” …and is “neither pagan nor sacred.” —Fr. Giacomo Costa, communications official for the Amazonian synod; California Catholic Daily, October 16th, 2019
[It is] an effigy of maternity and the sacredness of life… —Andrea Tornielli, editorial director for the Vatican’s Dicastery for Communications. —reuters.com
[It] represented life, fertility, mother earth. —Dr. Paolo Ruffini, Prefect of the Dicastery for Communications, vaticannews.va
Then the Pope himself referred to the statue under the South American title of ‘pachamama,’ which means “Mother Earth.” Indeed, the Italian Bishops’ publication arm produced a pamphlet for the Synod that included a “prayer to Mother Earth of the Inca peoples.” It read in part:
“Pachamama of these places, drink and eat this offering at will, so that this earth may be fruitful.” —Catholic World News, October 29th, 2019
Dr. Robert Moynihan of Inside the Vatican noted that, during the final Mass of the Synod, an Amazon woman presented a flower pot, which was then placed on the altar where it remained during the Consecration and thereafter. Moynihan notes that “a bowl of soil with plants in it is often connected with ceremonial rituals involving Pachamana” where “food and drinks are poured [into it] for the enjoyment of Pachamama” and then covered “with dirt and flowers.” It is recommended, the ritual states, “to do it with your hands to connect with the energy of the ritual.”
What can be said here regarding the absolutely tragic scandal of the Vatican — and nearly the entire episcopate — promoting and even pushing an experimental gene therapy upon the entire world? I wrote the bishops regarding the genocidal path they were endorsing, but it was met with complete silence. And neither have the death and injury tolls ceased to stop. In fact, they are increasing exponentially the past few months as “booster” shots are decimating people’s health. A Facebook group dedicated to family members and friends testifying to the absolute destruction of these mRNA gene shots has bloomed to over 157k members and is adding thousands by the day (shockingly, Facebook has not yet censored them; we are also posting them here). The stories they tell should be read by every bishop, and above all, the Pope — who continue to present themselves as Big Pharma’s global salesmen. It is outrageous. And yet, it is the very ones crying out in the wilderness against brutal and reckless government lockdowns, forced injections, masking, and other harmful measures — which did nothing to stop the virus, but everything to destroy businesses, livelihoods, and drive many to suicide — who are deemed the dangerous ones.
With some exceptions, governments have made great efforts to put the well-being of their people first, acting decisively to protect health and to save lives… most governments acted responsibly, imposing strict measures to contain the outbreak. Yet some groups protested, refusing to keep their distance, marching against travel restrictions—as if measures that governments must impose for the good of their people constitute some kind of political assault on autonomy or personal freedom!… We spoke earlier of narcissism, of armor-plated selves, of people who live off grievance, thinking only of themselves… they are incapable of moving outside of their own little world of interests. —POPE FRANCIS, Let Us Dream: The Path to a Better Future (pp. 26-28), Simon & Schuster (Kindle Edition)
But it doesn’t stop there. The Vatican is continuing its newfound role as prophets of the “Great Reset” — now promoting man-made “global warming” as a fact — this despite the Pontiff’s recent encyclical stating:
There are certain environmental issues where it is not easy to achieve a broad consensus. Here I would state once more that the Church does not presume to settle scientific questions or to replace politics. But I am concerned to encourage an honest and open debate so that particular interests or ideologies will not prejudice the common good. —Laudato si’, n. 188
However, there is no entity on the planet, outside of the climate change profit-makers and grant-seeking scientists, who have endorsed “climate change” more than the Vatican. Here too, the idea of an “honest and open debate” is being crushed:
…not taking care of the climate is a sin against the gift of God that is creation. In my opinion, this is a form of paganism: it is using those things that the Lord has given us for his glory and praise as if they were idols. —lifesitnews.com, April 14th, 2022
Here again, the faithful are left grappling with a statement that is so ironic, not only in face of the Pachamama scandal, but the fact the entire climate change movement was invented by globalists and integrated into the United Nations’ godless goals by the likes of the Marxist Maurice Strong and the late Michel Gorbachev.
In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself. —Alexander King & Bertrand Schneider. The First Global Revolution, p. 75, 1993
There you have in a nutshell the entire plan unfolding now in real time under the banner of the “Great Reset”: to manufacture global crises of water shortages, famine, and global warming — and then blame the little working guy just trying to feed his family for the problems. The globalists are lighting fires, and then blaming the ones who point out the smoke. In this way, these elite masters can justify their agenda to depopulate the world.
And thus at this hour, the prophetic voices of Paul VI, John Paul II and Benedict XVI warning against an anti-life agenda that seeks to control and impose itself upon the world, have been all but forgotten.
This marvelous world—so loved by the Father that he sent his only Son for its salvation—is the theater of a never-ending battle being waged for our dignity and identity as free, spiritual beings. This struggle parallels the apocalyptic combat described in [Revelation 12]. Death battles against Life: a “culture of death” seeks to impose itself on our desire to live, and live to the full. There are those who reject the light of life, preferring “the fruitless works of darkness” (Eph 5:11). Their harvest is injustice, discrimination, exploitation, deceit, violence. In every age, a measure of their apparent success is the death of the Innocents. In our own century, as at no other time in history, the “culture of death” has assumed a social and institutional form of legality to justify the most horrible crimes against humanity: genocide, “final solutions”, “ethnic cleansings”, and the massive “taking of lives of human beings even before they are born, or before they reach the natural point of death”… —POPE JOHN PAUL II, Homily, Cherry Creek State Park Homily, Denver, Colorado, August 15th, 1993; vatican.va
It is no longer the Gospel of Life that the Vatican is shouting from the rooftops; it is not the need for repentance from sin and a return to the Father; it is not the importance of prayer, the Sacraments, and virtue… but getting injected and buying solar panels that are the priorities of the hierarchy. It is not the 10 commandments but the UN’s 17 “sustainable development” goals that are the beating heart of Rome, so it seems.
As I’ve noted before, the Pontifical Academy of Sciences, and thus Francis, are basing their conclusions off of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which is not a scientific body. Marcelo Sanchez Sorondo, the Bishop-Chancellor of the Pontifical Academy stated:
There is now a growing consensus that human activities are having a discernible effect on the Earth’s climate (IPCC, 1996). An enormous amount of effort has gone into the scientific research that forms the basis for this judgment. —cf. Catholic.org
That’s troubling since the IPCC has been discredited on several occasions. Dr. Frederick Seitz, a world-famous physicist and former president of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences, criticized the 1996 IPCC report that used selective data and doctored graphs: “I have never witnessed a more disturbing corruption of the peer review process than events that led to this IPCC report,” he lamented. In 2007, the IPCC had to correct a report that exaggerated the pace of melt of the Himalayan glaciers and that wrongly claimed they could all vanish by 2035.The IPCC was caught again exaggerating global warming data in a report rushed through precisely in order to influence The Paris Agreement the Vatican is now cheerleading. That report fudged data in order to suggest no ‘pause‘ in global warming has occurred since the turn of this millennium.
This is a shameful and dark moment in the history of Catholicism. Taking care of the planet and providing health care to individuals are, to be clear, part of the “social” Gospel. But promoting the instruments of the culture of death are not. Catholics now find their leadership cheerleading the agenda of the culture of death rather than the life-saving message of Jesus Christ, who is Savior of the world. And “I’m angry.”
WHAT ARE WE DOING?
I have been careful not to impugn anyone’s motives or intentions, whether it is the Pope’s or the participants. The reason is that the motives at this point are irrelevant. What took place in the Vatican Gardens, by all exterior appearances, is a scandal. It resembled nothing short of a pagan ritual, whether it was or not. Some have tried to downplay the incident by insisting (against the Vatican’s official response) that the images were “Our Lady of the Amazon.” Again, that’s irrelevant. Catholics do not bow prostrate to the ground before statues of even Our Lady or the saints much less indigenous artifacts and symbols or mounds of dirt. Furthermore, the Pope did not himself venerate those images as such, and at the final Mass of the Synod, appeared to have brought in and properly venerated a typical image of Our Lady (which says a lot). Nonetheless, the damage has been done. Someone recounted to me how their Episcopalian friend has now accused us Catholics of worshipping Mary and/or statues.
Others I have spoken with insist that the prostrations before the objects were ultimately directed to God—and anyone who suggests otherwise is racist, intolerant, judgmental and antipapal. However, even if that was the intention of the worshippers, what the world witnessed did not look anything like a Catholic prayer service but a pagan ceremony. Indeed, several clergymen have stated this very point:
It is not understandable to an observer that the publicly displayed veneration of Pachamama at the Amazon Synod is not meant to be idolatry. —Bishop Marian Eleganti of Chur, Switzerland; October 26th, 2019;lifesitenews.com
After weeks of silence we are told by the Pope that this was not idolatry and there was no idolatrous intention. But then why did people, including priests, prostrate before it? Why was the statue carried in procession into churches like St. Peter’s Basilica and placed before altars at Santa Maria in Traspontina? And if it isn’t an idol of Pachamama (an earth/mother goddess from the Andes), why did the Pope call the image “Pachamama?” What am I to think? —Msgr. Charles Pope, October 28th, 2019; National Catholic Register
The syncretism evident in the ritual celebrated around an immense floor covering, directed by an Amazonian woman and in front of several ambiguous and unidentified images in the Vatican gardens this past October 4, should be avoided… the reason for the criticism is precisely because of the primitive nature and pagan appearance of the ceremony and the absence of openly Catholic symbols, gestures and prayers during the various gestures, dances and prostrations of that surprising ritual. —Cardinal Jorge Urosa Savino, archbishop emeritus of Caracas, Venezuela; October 21, 2019; lifesitenews.com
Herein lies the fire that has been stoked: where is our zeal to defend Jesus Christ and respect the First Commandment that forbids “strange gods” among us? Why are some Catholics trying to split hairs at this point to make a blatantly compromising activity look acceptable?
Put it this way. Imagine my wife and children walking into the bedroom and finding me holding another woman in our marital bed. The other woman and I then climb out as I explain, “There were no adulterous intentions here. I was just holding her because she does not know Christ and needs to know that she is loved, welcomed and that we are ready to accompany her in her faith.” Of course, my wife and children would be angry and scandalized, even if I insist that they are just being intolerant and judgmental.
The point is that our witness, the example we give to others, is essential, especially to the “little ones.”
Whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him to have a great millstone hung around his neck and to be drowned in the depths of the sea. (Matthew 18:6)
The invocation of the statues before which even some religious bowed at the Vatican… is an invocation of a mythical power, of Mother Earth, from which they ask blessings or make gestures of gratitude. These are scandalous demonic sacrileges, especially for the little ones who are not able to discern. —Bishop Emeritus José Luis Azcona Hermoso of Marajó, Brazil; October 30th, 2019, lifesitenews.com
That, at least, is the take of a prelate more familiar with the pagan worship of Mother Earth in those regions. The main point, however, is that what we say, what we do, how we behave, must always lead others to Christ. St. Paul went so far as to say that “it is right not to eat meat or drink wine or do anything that makes your brother stumble.”  How much more, then, ought we to be careful never to give a witness to others that money, possessions, power, our career, our image—much less secular or pagan images—are the object of our love.
Pachamama is not and never will be the Virgin Mary. To say that this statue represents the Virgin is a lie. She is not Our Lady of the Amazon because the only Lady of the Amazon is Mary of Nazareth. Let’s not create syncretistic mixtures. All of that is impossible: the Mother of God is the Queen of Heaven and earth. —Bishop Emeritus José Luis Azcona Hermoso of Marajó, Brazil; October 30th, 2019, lifesitenews.com
FAITHFULNESS TO JESUS
Before I went to Israel, I sensed the Lord say that we must “Walk in the footsteps of St. John” the beloved apostle. I have not fully understood why, until now.
As I wrote recently On Vatican Funkiness, even if a pope were to deny Jesus Christ (as Peter did after he was promised the Keys of the Kingdom and declared “the rock”), we ought to hold fast to Sacred Tradition and remain faithful to Jesus unto death. St. John did not “blindly follow” the first pope into his denial but turned in the opposite direction, walked to Golgotha, and remained steadfast beneath the Cross at the risk of His life. I am not suggesting in any way that Pope Francis has denied Christ. Rather, I am making the point that our shepherds are human, including Peter’s successor, and we are not required to defend their personal follies. Our faithfulness to them is obedience to their authentic magisterium, bestowed on them by Christ, regarding “faith and morals.” When they depart from that, either by non-binding statements or personal sin, there is no obligation to support their words or behaviour. But there is, however, an obligation to defend the truth—to defend Jesus Christ, who is Truth. And this must be done in charity.
Do not accept anything as the truth if it lacks love. And do not accept anything as love which lacks truth! One without the other becomes a destructive lie. —St. Teresa Benedicta (Edith Stein), quoted at her canonization by St. John Paul II, October 11th, 1998; vatican.va
We have completely lost the narrative of why the Church exists, what our mission is, and what our purpose is if we fail to love God, first, and our neighbour as ourselves.
The whole concern of doctrine and its teaching must be directed to the love that never ends. Whether something is proposed for belief, for hope or for action, the love of our Lord must always be made accessible, so that anyone can see that all the works of perfect Christian virtue spring from love and have no other objective than to arrive at love. —Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC), n. 25
It’s absolutely horrific how Christians have begun to tear one another apart today, especially “conservative” Christians. Here, St. John’s example is so powerful.
At the Last Supper, while the Apostles were busy trying to lay blame on who would betray Christ, and Judas was quietly dipping his hands in the same bowl as Jesus… St. John simply lay against the breast of Christ. He silently contemplated His Lord. He loved Him. He adored Him. He clung to Him. He worshipped Him. Therein lies the secret of how to pass through the Great Trial that is now upon us. It is absolute fidelity to Christ. It is abandonment to the Heavenly Father. It is An Invincible Faith in Jesus. It is not compromising our beliefs for fear of conflict or not being politically correct. It is not focusing on the storm and the waves but the Master in the boat. It is prayer. As Our Lady has been telling the Church for nearly forty years now: pray, pray, pray. Fast and pray. Only in this way will we have the grace and strength not to cave into our flesh and the principalities and powers that, in this hour, have been given sway to test the Church.
Prayer attends to the grace we need for meritorious actions. —(CCC, 2010)
Watch and pray that you may not enter into temptation; the spirit indeed is willing, but the flesh is weak. (Mark 14:38-39)
What are we to watch? We are to watch the signs of the times but to pray for the wisdom to interpret them. This was the key that led John alone among the Apostles to stand steadily beneath the Cross and to remain faithful to Jesus, despite the storm that raged around him. His eyes observed the signs around him, but he did not dwell on the terror and dysfunction. Rather, his heart was fixed on Jesus, even when everything seemed utterly lost.
Brothers and sisters, the trials that surround us are just the beginning. We have scarcely begun the hard labor pains. These days, I often hear in my heart the Scripture: “When the Son of Man comes, will he find faith on earth?” 
The answer is yes: in those who follow in the footsteps of St. John.
Support Mark’s full-time ministry:
To journey with Mark in The Now Word,
click on the banner below to subscribe.
Your email will not be shared with anyone.
Now on Telegram. Click:
Follow Mark and the daily “signs of the times” on MeWe:
Follow Mark’s writings here:
Listen on the following:
|↑1||The Moynihan Letters, Letter #59, October 30th, 2019|
|↑3||cf. The New Paganism – Part III|
|↑4||cf. Climate Confusion|
|↑7||cf. nypost.com; and January 22nd, 2017, investors.com; from study: nature.com|
|↑8||cf. Romans 14:21|
Spread The Now Word!
- HOME (1,677)
- A HEAVENLY MAP (5)
- A RESPONSE (11)
- BEGINNING AGAIN (5)
- CHARISMATIC? (7)
- FAITH AND MORALS (180)
- HUMAN SEXUALITY & FREEDOM (7)
- MARY (73)
- MASS READINGS (310)
- MILLENARIANISM (11)
- MY TESTIMONY (5)
- NEWS (91)
- PARALYZED BY FEAR (38)
- PRAYER RETREAT (44)
- SEVEN YEAR TRIAL (11)
- SIGNS (182)
- SPIRITUALITY (278)
- THE DIVINE WILL (26)
- THE ERA OF PEACE (77)
- THE FAMILY WEAPONS (14)
- THE FIVE POVERTIES (7)
- THE GREAT TRIALS (256)
- THE HARD TRUTH (44)
- THE NEW PAGANISM (10)
- THE PETALS (5)
- TIME OF GRACE (123)
- TRUMPETS OF WARNING! (10)
- VIDEOS & PODCASTS (84)
- WAIT A MINUTE (4)
- WHERE HEAVEN TOUCHES (7)
- WHY CATHOLIC? (9)
- ALL (39)
Archives Select Month September 2022 (1) August 2022 (4) July 2022 (5) June 2022 (3) May 2022 (2) April 2022 (2) March 2022 (5) February 2022 (5) January 2022 (7) December 2021 (7) November 2021 (7) October 2021 (6) September 2021 (5) August 2021 (5) July 2021 (3) June 2021 (2) May 2021 (6) April 2021 (6) March 2021 (9) February 2021 (10) January 2021 (9) December 2020 (9) November 2020 (7) October 2020 (15) September 2020 (5) August 2020 (6) July 2020 (10) June 2020 (13) May 2020 (9) April 2020 (11) March 2020 (12) February 2020 (7) January 2020 (9) December 2019 (7) November 2019 (11) October 2019 (6) September 2019 (6) August 2019 (1) July 2019 (4) June 2019 (6) May 2019 (9) April 2019 (15) March 2019 (5) February 2019 (9) January 2019 (7) December 2018 (3) November 2018 (10) October 2018 (8) September 2018 (5) August 2018 (4) July 2018 (2) June 2018 (6) May 2018 (13) April 2018 (10) March 2018 (8) February 2018 (13) January 2018 (11) December 2017 (10) November 2017 (10) October 2017 (11) September 2017 (9) August 2017 (11) July 2017 (9) June 2017 (9) May 2017 (10) April 2017 (8) March 2017 (9) February 2017 (8) January 2017 (9) December 2016 (14) November 2016 (13) October 2016 (6) September 2016 (15) August 2016 (7) July 2016 (6) June 2016 (8) May 2016 (10) April 2016 (7) March 2016 (25) February 2016 (21) January 2016 (8) December 2015 (7) November 2015 (9) October 2015 (11) September 2015 (9) August 2015 (5) July 2015 (8) June 2015 (8) May 2015 (9) April 2015 (9) March 2015 (27) February 2015 (17) January 2015 (11) December 2014 (10) November 2014 (7) October 2014 (21) September 2014 (20) August 2014 (6) July 2014 (6) June 2014 (5) May 2014 (19) April 2014 (22) March 2014 (26) February 2014 (24) January 2014 (27) December 2013 (24) November 2013 (6) October 2013 (5) September 2013 (3) August 2013 (2) July 2013 (4) June 2013 (1) May 2013 (6) April 2013 (7) March 2013 (11) February 2013 (10) January 2013 (3) December 2012 (2) November 2012 (3) October 2012 (3) September 2012 (5) August 2012 (1) July 2012 (3) June 2012 (5) May 2012 (2) April 2012 (5) March 2012 (5) February 2012 (7) January 2012 (6) December 2011 (8) November 2011 (6) October 2011 (7) September 2011 (3) August 2011 (5) July 2011 (4) June 2011 (9) May 2011 (4) April 2011 (1) March 2011 (4) February 2011 (3) January 2011 (7) December 2010 (7) November 2010 (5) October 2010 (5) September 2010 (5) August 2010 (3) July 2010 (5) June 2010 (7) May 2010 (9) April 2010 (14) March 2010 (8) February 2010 (8) January 2010 (5) December 2009 (8) November 2009 (6) October 2009 (5) September 2009 (4) August 2009 (4) July 2009 (7) June 2009 (7) May 2009 (5) April 2009 (8) March 2009 (2) February 2009 (8) January 2009 (13) December 2008 (10) November 2008 (9) October 2008 (11) September 2008 (10) August 2008 (7) July 2008 (2) June 2008 (5) May 2008 (7) April 2008 (8) March 2008 (10) February 2008 (7) January 2008 (5) December 2007 (12) November 2007 (9) October 2007 (5) September 2007 (10) August 2007 (8) July 2007 (5) June 2007 (5) May 2007 (6) April 2007 (7) March 2007 (4) February 2007 (6) January 2007 (10) December 2006 (9) November 2006 (10) October 2006 (10) September 2006 (24) August 2006 (19) July 2006 (16) June 2006 (21) May 2006 (17) April 2006 (19) March 2006 (22) February 2006 (16) January 2006 (16) December 2005 (10) November 2005 (1) June 2005 (1) April 2003 (1) March 2003 (1)
Website design © 2022 tiDesign